Objective
Using reproductive medicine is not a recent practice in China. While authorized artificial insemination and In Vitro fertilization have become common practice, the commercialization of gametes and surrogacy remains officially prohibited. However, an underground market of agencies and medical establishments has emerged in major cities, responding to the growing demands from the LGBTQ+ community and heterosexual couples who have lost their only child. How do the Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) and the surrogacy market operate in China? Why do some Chinese intended parents, when pursuing surrogacy abroad, anticipate having mixed-race children? How do these new reproductive practices challenge the traditional system of patrilineality and the conception of parenthood? As China experienced its first demographic decline in 2022 for the past sixty years, policies related to ARTs have gradually relaxing in recent years. How does this demographic challenge influence the political and legal development related to reproductive technologies? What kinds of ethical, legal, kinship, and gender issues are associated with surrogacy and ARTs in China, and how do they differ from those in European and American societies?
This project delves into the realm of ARTs and surrogacy in China, an unexplored area within the anthropology of contemporary kinship, primarily founded on European and American societies. Employing an interdisciplinary approach that combines anthropology, law, history and literature, this endeavor aims to enhance our understanding of Chinese modernity, contribute to a shift in anthropological knowledge about contemporary kinship, and shed light on the construction of bioethics and reproductive medicine laws in China. These insights may offer valuable reference points for other regions and countries, particularly in Europe, where ARTs remain contentious topics in public and political discussions.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities philosophy, ethics and religion ethics ethical principles
- humanities arts
- social sciences sociology anthropology
- social sciences other social sciences development studies development theories global development studies globalization
- social sciences law
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2025-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
75794 PARIS
France
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.