1) We have developed a web portal called DrugTargetCommons (
http://drugtargetcommons.fimm.fi/(opens in new window)) to manually curate and annotate drug-target activity data from publications [1-2]. The drug-target activity data has been applied in the recent DREAM Challenge to predict drug targets and drug sensitivities for cancer cell lines [3].
2) We have developed a network pharmacology approach that utilizes dynamic modeling of signaling pathways [4]. Furthermore, we have developed a computational tool called CES (Combined Essentiality Score) to predict the potential drug targets from functional genetic screens [5].
3) To make the drug combination screening data FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable), we have developed a web portal called DrugComb (
https://drugcomb.fimm.fi/(opens in new window)) [6]. We have developed a CSS score to evaluate the drug combination sensitivity [7]. To evaluate the statistical significance of drug response data, we have developed a numerical method to evaluate the transition probability of cell growth using birth-and-death models [8].
4) Together with my collaborators in the clinics, we have successfully applied these computational tools to evaluate the potential drug combinations for cancer patients, e.g. in T-PLL (T cell prolymphocytic leukemia) [9] and ovarian cancer patient samples [10].
5) More recently, we have developed AI-based text-mining approaches to mine the literature for extracting experimental drug-target interaction data [11]. We have also developed a data integration platform called MICHA for the FAIRification of drug sensitivity screening data [12]. We have successfully updated the DrugComb data portal with more comprehensive drug sensitivity screening data, not only for cancers but also for other diseases such as COVID-19 [13]. We have updated the SynergyFinder tool to allow the analysis of higher-order drug combinations with statistical significance testing [14]. We have also participated in multiple collaborative projects that involve the prediction and testing of drug combinations [15].
Taken together, we have successfully achieved the scientific goals of DrugComb by developing informatics approaches for predicting, understanding, and testing personalized drug combinations in cancer. All the methods are offered with open-source tools that are frequently used by life science researchers.
References:
[1] Tang et al.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.11.009(opens in new window) [2] Tanoli et al.
https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bay083(opens in new window) [3] Douglass et al.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100492(opens in new window) [4] Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-019-0098-z [5] Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.051 [6] Zagidullin et al.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz337(opens in new window). [7] Malyutina et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006752 [8] Pessia and Tang
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-020-00836-x(opens in new window) [9] He et al. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3644 [10] He et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab272 [11] Aldahdooh et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04768-x [12] Tanoli et al.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab350(opens in new window). [13] Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab438 [14] Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.01.004 [15] Jafari et al.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29793-5(opens in new window).