To fulfill the NEWTON project’s objectives, several research activities were conducted, which are grouped in 4 different but strongly interconnected Working Activities (WA):
WA1- Macroflow modelling
We have performed the first geodynamic model of the case studies Cascadia and the Mediterranean (main output of WA1; Zhou et al., 2018; Confal et al., 2018; Lo Bue et al., 2021, 2022). In addition, we have (i) tested alternative mechanisms for generating seismic anomalies in the upper and lower mantle in proximity of subducting slabs (Chen and Faccenda, 2019; Yang and Faccenda, 2020), (ii) found a relationship between plate speed and seismic anisotropy in the underlying asthenosphere (Kendall et al., 2022), (iii) discovered that imaged age-independent oceanic plate structure could be an artifact related to the resolving power of tomographic models (Rappisi et al., 2024), and (iv) generated subduction models that explain the presence of seismic anisotropy in the uppermost lower mantle (Ferreira et al., 2019; Sturgeon et al., 2019).
WA2 - Microflow and other types of fabric modelling
A new software package named ECOMAN (Exploring the Consequences of Mechanical Anisotropy in the maNtle) has been released in the project website. The package is intended to provide to the scientific community an efficient numerical tool for modelling the elastic and viscous properties of mantle aggregates and exploring the consequences of mechanical anisotropy in the Earth’s mantle (Faccenda et al., submitted).
The role of extrinsic elastic and viscous mechanical anisotropy on seismic anisotropy and mantle convection has been quantified (Faccenda et al., 2019; de Montserrat et al., 2021).
WA3 - SKS splitting seismology
We have determined the SKS splitting parameters in the Alp-Array and the Central Mediterranean area (Petrescu et al., 2020; Pondrelli et al., 2022, 2023; Confal et al., 2023) . These studies have constrained the large-scale mantle flow in the area, and inferred the source of mantle anisotropy in the sub-lithospheric mantle. A similar exercise has been done for the Hindu-Kush region (Peng et al., 2020).
WA4 - P-wave and S-wave inversions
We have developed and successfully tested new methodologies for jointly inverting seismic anisotropy using multiphase datasets including P-wave and S-wave travel-times and S-wave splitting intensity (VanderBeek and Faccenda, 2021; VanderBeek et al., 2023; Del Piccolo et al., 2024). This new technique allows to invert for arbitrarily oriented anisotropic patterns. The inverse methodologies has been applied to the imaging of the Mediterranean (Confal et al., 2020; Rappisi et al., 2022) and Cascadia (VanderBeek and Del Piccolo, 2023, AGU23) case studies, and also to other tectonic settings like divergent margins and intra-oceanic hotspot settings (Faccenda and Vanderbeek, 2023).