Project description
Ecological planning and historical planning experiments
Frameworks such as Degrowth (DG), the Green New Deal (GND), and Green Growth (GG) continue to debate the role of planning in addressing today’s social and ecological crises. However, there is a need for greater clarity on what planning means in the contemporary context. With the support of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the EcoPlanAge project will reassess planning as a key political concept of the 20th century and develop a new framework for democratic, ecological planning fit for the 21st century. The project will explore the political theories and concepts of nature, time, and gender put forward by neoliberals Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich August von Hayek, and by socialists Otto Neurath and Karl Polanyi. It will also examine how these ideas influenced historical planning experiments.
Objective
EcoPlanAge revisits planning as one of the crucial political concepts of the 20th century and offers a new conceptual framework for democratic ecological planning in the 21st century. With climate change, the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, expressions like ‘war economy’, ‘plan’ and ‘new deal’ have ceased to be relics of the past. Degrowth (DG), Green New Deal (GND) and Green Growth (GG) rationalities are either praising or criticizing planning as an effective tool to tackle our polycrisis. Yet, some celebrate its democratic nature, others perceive it as authoritarian. EcoPlanAge identifies an urgent need for conceptual clarification: what precisely does planning mean in the contemporary era? On what grounds is it praised or criticized? By crossing political theory, conceptual history and political ecology it shows how DG, GND, GG rationalities are still influenced by the two strains that have characterized the 1920s socialist calculation debate on planning possibilities: the formal rationality of neoliberalism and the substantive rationality of socialism. EcoPlanAge selects four authors who affect eco-planning debates: Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich August von Hayek (neoliberal strain); Otto Neurath and Karl Polanyi (socialist one). It reconstructs their epistemological and political theories and analyzes the conception of nature, time and gender that underpin their planning frameworks by highlighting the interrelation between their political theories and the concrete historical planning experiments of their time (war economies, Red Vienna, New Deal, Fascism, Nazism, Soviet planning). Finally, it discusses the utility of these planning theories in thinking about a new conceptual framework for democratic eco-planning in our age of polycrisis. The project will be carried out at the University of Bologna (Prof. Michele Filippini, Prof. Emanuele Leonardi), at Boston University (Prof. Quinn Slobodian) and at Brunel University London (Prof. Gareth Dale).
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-GF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - Global Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2024-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
40126 Bologna
Italy
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.