This project has produced 5 peer-reviewed research articles (plus 5 under review), and 5 reviews/chapters (incl. Voice Modulation: A window into the origins of human vocal control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 304-318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.002](odnośnik otworzy się w nowym oknie).
The results have been widely disseminated online (e.g. ResearchGate, Twitter, Facebook) through the media (BBC, CBC, Psychology Today, Telegraph, Time magazine, Men's Fitness), and in talks:
Research Conferences and Colloquia:
• Acoustical Societies of America/Japan (Honolulu USA)
• International Bioacoustics Council (Haridwar India)
• Polish Society for Human Evolution (Kraków Poland)
• British Psychological Association (Brighton UK)
• UK Research Office Symposium (Brighton UK)
• Sussex Psychology Colloquium
• Sussex Cognitive Brown Bag
Public Outreach Events:
• Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition (London UK)
• British Science Festival (Brighton UK)
• Get Psyched (Komedia Club, UK)
• BPS’s Weird Psychology (Brighton UK)
Study Summaries and Research Articles:
1. Longitudinal changes in the voice
In a longitudinal study of males aged 7-56, we show that voice pitch decreases during puberty, but remains remarkably stable throughout adulthood. Critically, pre-pubertal pitch predicts men’s pitch as adults, suggesting that within-individual differences in voice pitch that are known to play an important role in men’s reproductive success may be linked to prenatal androgen exposure.
• Published in Royal Society Open Science (doi:10.1098/rsos.160395)
In a follow-up study, we further show that the F0 of babies’ cries at 4 months of age predicts the F0 of their speech at 5 years of age.
• Under revision in Biology Letters
In a study tracking within-individual variation in mothers’ voices across 10 years, we show that mothers’ voices became significantly lower-pitched and more monotonous one year postpartum compared to during pregnancy or before, indicating that pregnancy has a transient and perceptually salient masculinizing effect on women’s voices.
• Under review in Proceedings of the Royal Society B
2. Spontaneous voice modulation across social contexts
To examine voice modulation in a real-life mating context, we recorded men and women in a speed-dating event. Both sexes lowered their voice pitch when interacting with desirable dates, supporting the hypothesis that voice modulation functions to elicit favourable judgments and behaviours from others, including potential mates. We also recorded men and women from UK, China, Finland, Poland, Slovakia and Tanzania (Hadza) in mocked social scenarios.
• Under revision in Evolution & Human Behavior
3. Volitional voice modulation for trait expression and exaggeration
In this study, we show that men and women from diverse countries spontaneously and systemically lower their voice pitch and vocal tract resonances to imitate a large body size. Men do so more than women. These results indicate potentially universal sound-size correspondences or anatomical and biomechanical constraints on voice modulation.
• Published in Scientific Reports (doi: 10.1038/srep34389) and Oxford Handbook of Voice Studies (in press).
With PhD student Jordan Raine, we show that nonverbal vocalisations (roars, screams, grunts) can convey critical cues (e.g. strength, pain intensity, contest outcome), supporting the hypothesis that human competitive vocalisations are homologous in form and function to those of other mammals.
• Published in Animal Behaviour (doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.02)
• Three additional articles under review.
4. Perceptual biases in voice perception
In a series of playback experiments we provide novel evidence for a multidimensional mapping of voice pitch to size and space, and, utilizing a large sample of blind and sighted adults, show that visual deprivation does not affect pitch-size correspondences, implicating a potential role of structurally-innate associations in pitch perception.
• Published in Attention, Perception & Psychophysics (doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1273-6) and Cognition (doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.023)